Close up of woman holding two baby car seats outdoors

26 Factors a Florida Court Considers in Determining Child Timesharing

Often, I get asked how does a court conclude which parent should have majority time sharing and which parent should have visitation rights. The first thing that comes to mind is that in Florida, the term “Child Custody” is no longer used. Instead, child custody is referred to as parenting “time sharing.” This is a stressful circumstance for many parents as this means that they may be away from their children. Time sharing is important as well in order to make a determination of child support.

To answer the question, the following is a list of factors the Court considers when considering parenting time sharing. Although no factor is weighed more than another, judges focus on the overall matter in front of them, this is often referred to as “the best interest of the child.” Some judges weigh some factors more heavily than others. As per Florida Statute Section 61.13, here are the 26 factors used to determine parenting time sharing.

  • The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship, to honor the time-sharing schedule, and to be reasonable when changes are required.
  • The anticipated division of parental responsibilities after the litigation, including the extent to which parental responsibilities will be delegated to third parties.
  • The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to determine, consider, and act upon the needs of the child as opposed to the needs or desires of the parent.
  • The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity.
  • The geographic viability of the parenting plan, with special attention paid to the needs of school-age children and the amount of time to be spent traveling to effectuate the parenting plan. This factor does not create a presumption for or against relocation of either parent with a child.
  • The moral fitness of the parents.
  • The mental and physical health of the parents.
  • The home, school, and community record of the child.
  • The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference.
  • The demonstrated knowledge, capacity, and disposition of each parent to be informed of the circumstances of the minor child, including, but not limited to, the child’s friends, teachers, medical care providers, daily activities, and favorite things.
  • The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to provide a consistent routine for the child, such as discipline, and daily schedules for homework, meals, and bedtime.
  • The demonstrated capacity of each parent to communicate with and keep the other parent informed of issues and activities regarding the minor child, and the willingness of each parent to adopt a unified front on all major issues when dealing with the child.
  • Evidence of domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, regardless of whether a prior or pending action relating to those issues has been brought. If the court accepts evidence of prior or pending actions regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, the court must specifically acknowledge in writing that such evidence was considered when evaluating the best interests of the child.
  • Evidence that either parent has knowingly provided false information to the court regarding any prior or pending action regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect.
  • The particular parenting tasks customarily performed by each parent and the division of parental responsibilities before the institution of litigation and during the pending litigation, including the extent to which parenting responsibilities were undertaken by third parties.
  • The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to participate and be involved in the child’s school and extracurricular activities.
  • The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to maintain an environment for the child which is free from substance abuse.
  • The capacity and disposition of each parent to protect the child from the ongoing litigation as demonstrated by not discussing the litigation with the child, not sharing documents or electronic media related to the litigation with the child, and refraining from disparaging comments about the other parent to the child.
  • The developmental stages and needs of the child and the demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to meet the child’s developmental needs.
  • Any other factor that is relevant to the determination of a specific parenting plan, including the time-sharing schedule.

As with any family matter, part of what makes any matter so complex is the fact that everyone’s situation is unique. Some people may assume that simply because their friend or family members had an outcome, that their matters will have the same outcome. This is simply not the case and it is important to consult an experienced attorney that will fully analyze and assess the circumstances of your case.

If you find yourself in this circumstance where you are fighting to have time sharing of your children and you would like to seek legal help, please contact us right away. We’ll sit down with you, go over the details of your case, and help you to determine what the next steps should be.

Ratings and Reviews

Juan Carlos SomozaReviewsout of 2 reviews